Skip to main content

after god came programmers

This post is in protest of all the people who think programmers are a bunch of idiots.

A computer was invented for the sole reason of eliminating the redundance of human tasks. It is a machine that imitates the human mind and action. In a way, it can be considered to be a mirror of the human mind. Yes i agree that in certain ways, all objects man-made are reflections of the human mind, but only the computer comes close to imitating it in such totality, without complying with the natural laws of nature.

It is a presentation instrument; where thoughts are brought into reality. If a train of thoughts can be traced precisely, outlined concisely. It can be made into a program. It will do only that work, until taught to do something else, but will do it at a fraction of the cost and with near 100% accuracy. Also no allowances, strikes, overtime and productivity issues. Just a little bit of dusting and maintaining the flow of raw materials and electricity.

This means that all, and i mean all, professionals in all fields of mass production are expendable.

So next time, remember, programmers are a serious lot because programming is very, very serious business.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The first half of 2017 in review

Hi people, Half the year is over and i think its good to list out things, so that i have an idea as to how i am doing with my studies ( and pretty much everything else ). It's been a wonderful and fulfilling half year, to be honest. I did a lot of things I always wanted to do.  I started experimenting with hydroponics - haven't really progressed much, but I am sure I will do something substantial in the other half of the year. Benefits are a lot over traditional way, and the joy of watching your plants grow are invaluable, at the least. I read a few books on history. I have always wanted to do this , but I always had an excuse or 2 to avoid it. I finally started, and it's brought me a sense of childlike wonder, something I sorely missed. I cleaned my home! That's 20 years of procrastination right there! It was insane but I got it done. Whew! And wow!  At the beginning of the year, i finished my re-study of the CS subjects. Post February, i opened th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Year 2016 in review and goals for 2017

Hello people, It's my 34th birthday today and I wanted to put the past year in review and where I wanted my life to go in the next year. Achievements of this year: Machine learning course by Andrew Ng ( completed ) Calculus I by Robert Ghrist ( completed ) Calculus II by Robert Ghrist ( completed ) Probability and Statistics ( 2 weeks left ) Data science - pandas ( 1 week done )  My first linear regression program Built a neural network from scratch  My first Regex. From scratch. No references. With tests. Algorithms I by Robert Sedgwick ( only audit ) Algorithms II by Robert Sedgwick ( only audit ) Also did the BE subjects for CS, all the stuff I had learned over the years. I am super happy to know that MOOCS help a lot in career advancement . Self-help books that really helped: How to win friends and influence people - Dale Carnegie   A mind for Numbers - Barbara Oakley   Altogether, a pretty good year, where le...
Post a Comment
Read more

When you say........

......you don't believe in god, you admit there is a god to believe in This is the meme post that started this train of thought in my mind.   I have heard one of my classmates say a long time ago, if women truly believed that they were equal to men, then they would not fight for it. While I never accepted it, i didn't know how to speak against it either. but it was there, somewhere in my mind. I think i made some sense out of it, at last. This is stupidity. This is like saying 'If we Indians seriously believed that freedom was ours, we would never have had to fight for it'. The fight for independance was a fight to make the other party understand and/or accept your viewpoint. The first resonable method might be to consider the other person's viewpoint. And using that as a base point,then work, with suitable proof and arguments, raise, alter, or reconstruct their viewpoint to match ours. This method follows the logic that people can and will be fair in an...
Post a Comment
Read more